lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200405114959.335eae46@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Sun, 5 Apr 2020 11:49:59 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree

Hi all,

After merging the rcu tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:

kernel/trace/ftrace.c: In function 'ftrace_shutdown':
kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2924:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude'; did you mean 'synchronize_rcu_tasks'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 2924 |   synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude();
      |   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |   synchronize_rcu_tasks

Caused by commit

  59377f3e06b8 ("ftrace: Use synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude() instead of ftrace_sync()")

synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude() is only declared when
CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_GENERIC is defined.

I have reverted that commit for today.

Just asking: are all the commits currently in the rcu tree actually
intended for v5.7?
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ