[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEUhbmW3tkOxu99VHhMCOSFoonp7Z9TuNsN22JBhYT7a+2vk8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2020 22:36:50 +0800
From: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@...il.com>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mao Han <han_mao@...ky.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Nick Hu <nickhu@...estech.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vincent Chen <vincent.chen@...ive.com>,
Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 01/11] RISC-V: Mark existing SBI as 0.1 SBI.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 9:11 AM Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com> wrote:
>
> As per the new SBI specification, current SBI implementation version
> is defined as 0.1 and will be removed/replaced in future. Each of the
> function call in 0.1 is defined as a separate extension which makes
> easier to replace them one at a time.
>
> Rename existing implementation to reflect that. This patch is just
> a preparatory patch for SBI v0.2 and doesn't introduce any functional
> changes.
>
nits: remove the ending period in the commit title
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
> Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h | 41 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
[snip]
Other than that,
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists