[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k12usr21.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 10:40:38 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@...ux.ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Eric Richter <erichte@...ux.ibm.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Gustavo Luiz Duarte <gustavold@...ux.ibm.com>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/8] Disable compat cruft on ppc64le v11
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com> writes:
> Christophe Leroy's on April 3, 2020 5:26 pm:
>> Le 03/04/2020 à 09:25, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
>>> Michal Suchanek's on March 19, 2020 10:19 pm:
>>>> Less code means less bugs so add a knob to skip the compat stuff.
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v2: saner CONFIG_COMPAT ifdefs
>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>> - change llseek to 32bit instead of builing it unconditionally in fs
>>>> - clanup the makefile conditionals
>>>> - remove some ifdefs or convert to IS_DEFINED where possible
>>>> Changes in v4:
>>>> - cleanup is_32bit_task and current_is_64bit
>>>> - more makefile cleanup
>>>> Changes in v5:
>>>> - more current_is_64bit cleanup
>>>> - split off callchain.c 32bit and 64bit parts
>>>> Changes in v6:
>>>> - cleanup makefile after split
>>>> - consolidate read_user_stack_32
>>>> - fix some checkpatch warnings
>>>> Changes in v7:
>>>> - add back __ARCH_WANT_SYS_LLSEEK to fix build with llseek
>>>> - remove leftover hunk
>>>> - add review tags
>>>> Changes in v8:
>>>> - consolidate valid_user_sp to fix it in the split callchain.c
>>>> - fix build errors/warnings with PPC64 !COMPAT and PPC32
>>>> Changes in v9:
>>>> - remove current_is_64bit()
>>>> Chanegs in v10:
>>>> - rebase, sent together with the syscall cleanup
>>>> Changes in v11:
>>>> - rebase
>>>> - add MAINTAINERS pattern for ppc perf
>>>
>>> These all look good to me. I had some minor comment about one patch but
>>> not really a big deal and there were more cleanups on top of it, so I
>>> don't mind if it's merged as is.
>>>
>>> Actually I think we have a bit of stack reading fixes for 64s radix now
>>> (not a bug fix as such, but we don't need the hash fault logic in radix),
>>> so if I get around to that I can propose the changes in that series.
>>>
>>
>> As far as I can see, there is a v12
>
> For the most part I was looking at the patches in mpe's next-test
> tree on github, if that's the v12 series, same comment applies but
> it's a pretty small nitpick.
Yeah I have v12 in my tree.
This has floated around long enough (our fault), so I'm going to take it
and we can fix anything up later.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists