[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <59ee9556-6289-8630-f753-f1267d82f737@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2020 23:45:43 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@...mail.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull proc and exec work for 5.7-rc1
On 4/4/20 11:35 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> To be symmetric with the existing downgrade_write() function, I will
>> choose the name upgrade_read() for the upgrade function.
>>
>> Will that work for you?
>>
> May I ask, if the proposed rwsem will also work for RT-linux,
> or will it be a normal mutex there?
Good question. RT have their own special code for rwsem. I need to take
a look at that to see if something like that is possible.
Cheers,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists