lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1586062423.4816.15.camel@gmx.de>
Date:   Sun, 05 Apr 2020 06:53:43 +0200
From:   Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: 0087-rcu-Use-a-raw_spinlock_t-for-kfree-batching.patch

Hi Sebastian,

Just a heads up wrt $subject...

I had done the same in my 5.6 tree, but then 5.7 came along, and I had
to revisit due to 34c881745549e adding an allocation under that lock
with irqs disabled.  The same commit that added the lock added this.

	local_irq_save(flags);  // For safely calling this_cpu_ptr().

Whacking that instead of converting the lock cures 5.6 and 5.7 woes.

	-Mike

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ