[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1586062423.4816.15.camel@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 06:53:43 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: 0087-rcu-Use-a-raw_spinlock_t-for-kfree-batching.patch
Hi Sebastian,
Just a heads up wrt $subject...
I had done the same in my 5.6 tree, but then 5.7 came along, and I had
to revisit due to 34c881745549e adding an allocation under that lock
with irqs disabled. The same commit that added the lock added this.
local_irq_save(flags); // For safely calling this_cpu_ptr().
Whacking that instead of converting the lock cures 5.6 and 5.7 woes.
-Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists