[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2004061618580.45667@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 16:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Add kvfree_sensitive() for freeing sensitive data
objects
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020, David Howells wrote:
> David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> > > +static inline void kvfree_sensitive(const void *addr, size_t len)
> > > +{
> > > + if (addr) {
> >
> > Shouldn't this be if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(addr))?
>
> You've reversed the logic - it needs a '!' there.
>
Ah lol, yeah. Probably just better to do
if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(addr)))
return;
but I agree that mm.h is likely not the right spot.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists