[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5b8b22bb-8236-1c88-5335-a0444aed79a4@web.de>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 16:56:34 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Qiujun Huang <hqjagain@...il.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] powerpc/powernv: Return directly after a failed
of_property_read_u64_array() in opal_add_one_export()
> We don't need to go to the labal of out …
Please avoid a typo for this change description.
> fails, as there is nothing to do. Just return.
I suggest to reconsider also this wording.
Return directly after a call of the function “of_property_read_u64_array”
failed at the beginning.
> And we can …
Do such words indicate that even this patch approach should be split
into further update steps?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists