[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200406115653-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 11:57:43 -0400
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@...el.com>,
Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@...el.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...lanox.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] virtio: stop using legacy struct vring
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 05:56:02PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 11:35:23AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > struct vring (in the uapi directory) and supporting APIs are kept
> > around to avoid breaking old userspace builds.
> > It's not actually part of the UAPI - it was kept in the UAPI
> > header by mistake, and using it in kernel isn't necessary
> > and prevents us from making changes safely.
> > In particular, the APIs actually assume the legacy layout.
> >
> > Add struct vring_s (identical ATM) and supporting
> > legacy APIs and switch everyone to use that.
>
> How are we going to know that "struct vring_s" is what we need/want to
> use? What does "_s" mean?
>
> "struct vring_kernel"?
>
> naming is hard...
>
> greg k-h
Hmm. I guess I can just add an ifdef so kernel doesn't see the UAPI
version anymore ...
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists