lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 6 Apr 2020 09:15:51 -0700
From:   Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
Cc:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Andrey Zhizhikin <andrey.z@...il.com>,
        Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] tools api: add a lightweight buffered reading api

On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 7:09 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<arnaldo.melo@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Em Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 12:06:45PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 12:44 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The synthesize benchmark shows the majority of execution time going to
> > > fgets and sscanf, necessary to parse /proc/pid/maps. Add a new buffered
> > > reading library that will be used to replace these calls in a follow-up
> > > CL.
>
> waiting for some conclusion to this thread,
>
> - Arnaldo

Thanks, sorry I was busy at the weekend. I agree with Namhyung's
comments, nice catch! Fwiw, it comes from my refactoring this api out
of a specific /proc/pid/maps reader. I'll work to address the issue
and ideally stick some tests of the corner cases somewhere - any
suggestions? This doesn't feel like a perf test, nor is it a kernel
side test.

Thanks,
Ian

> > > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> > > ---
> > >  tools/lib/api/io.h | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 107 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 tools/lib/api/io.h
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/lib/api/io.h b/tools/lib/api/io.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..5aa5b0e26a7a
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tools/lib/api/io.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > > +/*
> > > + * Lightweight buffered reading library.
> > > + *
> > > + * Copyright 2019 Google LLC.
> > > + */
> > > +#ifndef __API_IO__
> > > +#define __API_IO__
> > > +
> > > +struct io {
> > > +       /* File descriptor being read/ */
> > > +       int fd;
> > > +       /* Size of the read buffer. */
> > > +       unsigned int buf_len;
> > > +       /* Pointer to storage for buffering read. */
> > > +       char *buf;
> > > +       /* End of the storage. */
> > > +       char *end;
> > > +       /* Currently accessed data pointer. */
> > > +       char *data;
> > > +       /* Set true on when the end of file on read error. */
> > > +       bool eof;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static inline void io__init(struct io *io, int fd,
> > > +                           char *buf, unsigned int buf_len)
> > > +{
> > > +       io->fd = fd;
> > > +       io->buf_len = buf_len;
> > > +       io->buf = buf;
> > > +       io->end = buf;
> > > +       io->data = buf;
> > > +       io->eof = false;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/* Reads one character from the "io" file with similar semantics to fgetc. */
> > > +static inline int io__get_char(struct io *io)
> > > +{
> > > +       char *ptr = io->data;
> > > +
> > > +       if (ptr == io->end) {
> > > +               ssize_t n = read(io->fd, io->buf, io->buf_len);
> > > +
> > > +               if (n <= 0) {
> > > +                       io->eof = true;
> > > +                       return -1;
> > > +               }
> > > +               ptr = &io->buf[0];
> > > +               io->end = &io->buf[n];
> > > +       }
> > > +       io->data = ptr + 1;
> > > +       return *ptr;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/* Read a hexadecimal value with no 0x prefix into the out argument hex.
> > > + * Returns -1 on error or if nothing is read, otherwise returns the character
> > > + * after the hexadecimal value.
> > > + */
> > > +static inline int io__get_hex(struct io *io, __u64 *hex)
> > > +{
> > > +       bool first_read = true;
> > > +
> > > +       *hex = 0;
> > > +       while (true) {
> > > +               char ch = io__get_char(io);
> > > +
> >
> > Maybe you can add this
> >
> >     if (io->eof)
> >         return 0;
> >
> > Please see below
> >
> >
> > > +               if (ch < 0)
> > > +                       return ch;
> > > +               if (ch >= '0' && ch <= '9')
> > > +                       *hex = (*hex << 4) | (ch - '0');
> > > +               else if (ch >= 'a' && ch <= 'f')
> > > +                       *hex = (*hex << 4) | (ch - 'a' + 10);
> > > +               else if (ch >= 'A' && ch <= 'F')
> > > +                       *hex = (*hex << 4) | (ch - 'A' + 10);
> > > +               else if (first_read)
> > > +                       return -1;
> > > +               else
> > > +                       return ch;
> > > +               first_read = false;
> > > +       }
> > > +}
> >
> > What if a file contains hex digits at the end (without trailing spaces)?
> > I guess it'd see EOF and return -1, right?
> >
> > And it'd better to be clear when it sees a big hex numbers -
> > it could have a comment that it'd simply discard upper bits
> > or return an error.
> >
> > > +
> > > +/* Read a decimal value into the out argument dec.
> > > + * Returns -1 on error or if nothing is read, otherwise returns the character
> > > + * after the decimal value.
> > > + */
> > > +static inline int io__get_dec(struct io *io, __u64 *dec)
> > > +{
> > > +       bool first_read = true;
> > > +
> > > +       *dec = 0;
> > > +       while (true) {
> > > +               char ch = io__get_char(io);
> > > +
> > > +               if (ch < 0)
> > > +                       return ch;
> > > +               if (ch >= '0' && ch <= '9')
> > > +                       *dec = (*dec * 10) + ch - '0';
> > > +               else if (first_read)
> > > +                       return -1;
> > > +               else
> > > +                       return ch;
> > > +               first_read = false;
> > > +       }
> > > +}
> >
> > Ditto.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Namhyung
> >
> >
> > > +
> > > +#endif /* __API_IO__ */
> > > --
> > > 2.26.0.rc2.310.g2932bb562d-goog
> > >
>
> --
>
> - Arnaldo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ