lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200406163835.GB3230@ubuntu>
Date:   Mon, 6 Apr 2020 18:38:36 +0200
From:   Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@....com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Forest Bond <forest@...ttletooquiet.net>,
        Malcolm Priestley <tvboxspy@...il.com>,
        Quentin Deslandes <quentin.deslandes@...ev.co.uk>,
        Amir Mahdi Ghorbanian <indigoomega021@...il.com>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] staging: vt6656: Use define instead of magic number
 for tx_rate

On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 04:22:12PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 04:13:59PM +0200, Oscar Carter wrote:
> > Use the define RATE_11M present in the file "device.h" instead of the
> > magic number 3. So the code is more clear.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@....com>
> > Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/vt6656/baseband.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/baseband.c b/drivers/staging/vt6656/baseband.c
> > index 3e4bd637849a..a785f91c1566 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/baseband.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/baseband.c
> > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> >
> >  #include <linux/bits.h>
> >  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include "device.h"
> >  #include "mac.h"
> >  #include "baseband.h"
> >  #include "rf.h"
> > @@ -141,7 +142,7 @@ unsigned int vnt_get_frame_time(u8 preamble_type, u8 pkt_type,
> >
> >  	rate = (unsigned int)vnt_frame_time[tx_rate];
> >
> > -	if (tx_rate <= 3) {
> > +	if (tx_rate <= RATE_11M) {
> >  		if (preamble_type == 1)
> >  			preamble = 96;
> >  		else
> > --
> > 2.20.1
>
> This doesn't apply to my tree :(
>
Sorry, but I don't understand what it means. This meant that I need to rebase
this patch against your staging-next branch of your staging tree ? Or it means
something else ?

Thanks,
oscar carter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ