lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgT6W7z-ZUB=hqx96tp+u2Hg-0KbnnWWufwVWbVgXXHXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 6 Apr 2020 10:58:28 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Add kvfree_sensitive() for freeing sensitive data objects

On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 10:51 AM David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> The allocation might be by vmalloc rather than kmalloc.  I'm not sure if that
> makes things more difficult.

It does add yet another place where we'd have to save the "this
allocation is special", but it's not insurmountable.

That said, I think the short-term and simple solution is to just teach
people that sensitive free's are different, and at least have the key
subsystem with sane naming.

And yes, then eventually convert the existing crypto subsystem uses
too for consistency.

            Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ