[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgT6W7z-ZUB=hqx96tp+u2Hg-0KbnnWWufwVWbVgXXHXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 10:58:28 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Add kvfree_sensitive() for freeing sensitive data objects
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 10:51 AM David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> The allocation might be by vmalloc rather than kmalloc. I'm not sure if that
> makes things more difficult.
It does add yet another place where we'd have to save the "this
allocation is special", but it's not insurmountable.
That said, I think the short-term and simple solution is to just teach
people that sensitive free's are different, and at least have the key
subsystem with sane naming.
And yes, then eventually convert the existing crypto subsystem uses
too for consistency.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists