[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7fd2b098-0ad2-accc-a149-77680aeb4411@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 10:19:23 +0530
From: Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>, lsrao@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 4/7] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Save base address of drv
Hi,
On 4/2/2020 10:30 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:20 AM Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> Add changes to save drv's base address for rsc. This is
>> used to read drv's configuration such as solver mode is
>> supported or to write into drv's registers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-internal.h | 2 ++
>> drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c | 11 +++++------
>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> I still see no usage of "drv->base" outside of the probe function even
> after applying your whole patch series. That implies that it can just
> stay as a local variable.
>
> If you have a later patch series that needs "drv->base" in some other
> RPMH function then this patch should be moved to the front of that
> series. Until then it feels like it should be dropped.
>
>
> -Doug
Okay, i will drop this and keep base local to probe only for now.
Thanks,
Maulik
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists