[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.2004061417050.19877-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 14:20:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: raw-gadget: fix raw_event_queue_fetch locking
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> If queue->size check in raw_event_queue_fetch() fails (which normally
> shouldn't happen, that check is a fail-safe), the function returns
> without reenabling interrupts. This patch fixes that issue, along with
> propagating the cause of failure to the function caller.
>
> Fixes: f2c2e717642c ("usb: gadget: add raw-gadget interface"
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
> ---
>
> Greg, this should apply cleanly on top of Dan's "usb: raw-gadget: Fix
> copy_to/from_user() checks" patch.
>
> ---
> drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/raw_gadget.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/raw_gadget.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/raw_gadget.c
> index e490ffa1f58b..1582521ec774 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/raw_gadget.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/raw_gadget.c
> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static int raw_event_queue_add(struct raw_event_queue *queue,
> static struct usb_raw_event *raw_event_queue_fetch(
> struct raw_event_queue *queue)
> {
> + int ret;
> unsigned long flags;
> struct usb_raw_event *event;
>
> @@ -89,11 +90,14 @@ static struct usb_raw_event *raw_event_queue_fetch(
> * there's at least one event queued by decrementing the semaphore,
> * and then take the lock to protect queue struct fields.
> */
> - if (down_interruptible(&queue->sema))
> - return NULL;
> + ret = down_interruptible(&queue->sema);
> + if (ret)
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> spin_lock_irqsave(&queue->lock, flags);
> - if (WARN_ON(!queue->size))
> + if (WARN_ON(!queue->size)) {
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->lock, flags);
> return NULL;
Suppose the WARN_ON triggers, and you return NULL here. Then where do
you reverse the down_interruptible() on queue->sema?
> + }
> event = queue->events[0];
> queue->size--;
> memmove(&queue->events[0], &queue->events[1],
> @@ -522,10 +526,17 @@ static int raw_ioctl_event_fetch(struct raw_dev *dev, unsigned long value)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->lock, flags);
>
> event = raw_event_queue_fetch(&dev->queue);
> - if (!event) {
> + if (PTR_ERR(event) == -EINTR) {
> dev_dbg(&dev->gadget->dev, "event fetching interrupted\n");
> return -EINTR;
> }
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(event)) {
> + dev_err(&dev->gadget->dev, "failed to fetch event\n");
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->lock, flags);
> + dev->state = STATE_DEV_FAILED;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->lock, flags);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
Not here, obviously. Does the semaphore ever get released?
Alan Stern
Powered by blists - more mailing lists