linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Coccinelle: zalloc_simple: Fix patch mode for dma_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2004062115000.10239@hadrien>
Date:   Mon, 6 Apr 2020 21:15:29 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
To:     Alex Dewar <alex.dewar@....co.uk>
cc:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        cocci@...teme.lip6.fr, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Coccinelle: zalloc_simple: Fix patch mode for
 dma_alloc_coherent()



On Fri, 3 Apr 2020, Alex Dewar wrote:

> Commit dfd32cad146e ("dma-mapping: remove dma_zalloc_coherent()"), in
> removing dma_zalloc_coherent() treewide, inadvertently removed the patch
> rule for dma_alloc_coherent(), leaving Coccinelle unable to auto-generate
> patches for this case. Fix this.
>
> Fixes: dfd32cad146e ("dma-mapping: remove dma_zalloc_coherent()")
> CC: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Dewar <alex.dewar@....co.uk>
> ---
>  scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci
> index 26cda3f48f01..c53aab7fe096 100644
> --- a/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci
> +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci
> @@ -70,6 +70,15 @@ statement S;
>  - x = (T)vmalloc(E1);
>  + x = (T)vzalloc(E1);
>  |
> +- x = dma_alloc_coherent(E2,E1,E3,E4);
> ++ x = dma_alloc_coherent(E2,E1,E3,E4);

Hi,

I don't understand the above case.  The before and after code seem to be
the same?

julia


> +|
> +- x = (T *)dma_alloc_coherent(E2,E1,E3,E4);
> ++ x = dma_alloc_coherent(E2,E1,E3,E4);
> +|
> +- x = (T)dma_alloc_coherent(E2,E1,E3,E4);
> ++ x = (T)dma_alloc_coherent(E2,E1,E3,E4);
> +|
>  - x = kmalloc_node(E1,E2,E3);
>  + x = kzalloc_node(E1,E2,E3);
>  |
> --
> 2.26.0
>
>