[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <69c5a02d-994e-9141-3638-cbe08f5e112e@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 11:36:59 +0530
From: sumitg <sumitg@...dia.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC: <rjw@...ysocki.net>, <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>,
<thierry.reding@...il.com>, <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
<talho@...dia.com>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <bbasu@...dia.com>,
<mperttunen@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [TEGRA194_CPUFREQ Patch v2 0/3] Add cpufreq driver for Tegra194
On 06/04/20 8:17 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On 05-04-20, 00:59, Sumit Gupta wrote:
>> The patch series adds cpufreq driver for Tegra194 SOC.
>>
>> v1[1] -> v2:
>> - Remove cpufreq_lock mutex from tegra194_cpufreq_set_target [Viresh].
>> - Remove CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION flag [Viresh].
>> - Remove redundant _begin|end() call from tegra194_cpufreq_set_target.
>> - Rename opp_table to freq_table [Viresh].
>
> Have we concluded the earlier discussion already ? I posted some
> questions where I had doubts and you just answered them and posted a
> new version. Please wait for the reviewers to have a chance to reply
> to them. Your new version may be okay, but still we can avoid another
> set of patches which may be wrong.
>
> --
> viresh
>
Sorry for that. I will wait for ongoing review to conclude before
posting new version.
Thankyou for the inputs.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists