[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfvUN=E-_n8VAKQ9nQ7mr2hbjS38bYCBbCdh02pxphOwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 01:31:01 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
"Tobin C . Harding" <me@...in.cc>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vsprintf: don't obfuscate NULL and error pointers
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 12:45 AM Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 8:23 PM Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Petr,
>
> Bump, as I don't see this in linux-next or other public branches.
> The discussion was split between several threads, revolving around
> the vision for how lib/test_printf.c should be structured, but the
> fix itself wasn't disputed.
>
> Could you please pick it up for 5.7-rc1? If you want to restructure
> the test suite before adding any new test cases, v1 doesn't have them.
> Other than the test cases, the only difference between v1 and v2 is
> added reviews and acks.
Petr has some obstacles that prevent him to pay attention on this and
actually do anything right now for Linux kernel.
If Rasmus, Sergey, you and maybe others will got consensus here, I
think Andrew can take it thru his tree.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists