[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <749735.1586300050@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 23:54:10 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, law@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: Add kvfree_sensitive() for freeing sensitive data objects
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > It might be worth asking the compiler folks to give us an __attribute__ for
> > that - even if they don't do anything with it immediately. So we might have
> > something like:
> >
> > void free(const volatile void *ptr) __attribute__((free(1)));
>
> Yeah, that sounds sane.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94527
> Even if it wasn't initially used for anything it wouldn't hurt, and maybe
> some day it would improve warnings (and allow the compiler to do the dead
> store elimination that started this whole long set of threads in the first
> place..)
With regard to this, I've got back "not sure what Linus was talking about WRT
DSE, if he's got examples he could pass along, they'd be appreciated"
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists