[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200407060242.GA15050@taoren-ubuntu-R90MNF91>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 23:02:43 -0700
From: Tao Ren <rentao.bupt@...il.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org, taoren@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] usb: gadget: aspeed: improve vhub port irq handling
Hi Ben,
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 11:48:27PM -0700, Tao Ren wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 09:45:38PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-04-01 at 14:58 -0700, Tao Ren wrote:
> > > Hi Ben,
> > >
> > > Any further comments on the patch?
> >
> > Ah sorry, nope. Did you check the generated assembly to see if it
> > looked any better ? :-)
> >
> > Otherwise,
> >
> > Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
>
> Thanks Ben for the review. Let me see if I can collect some runtime data
> on my ast2400 BMC platform. Will update back later.
I ran some testing on my ast2400 and ast2500 BMC and looks like the
for() loop runs faster than for_each_set_bit_from() loop in my
environment. I'm not sure if something needs to be revised in my test
code, but please kindly share your suggestions:
I use get_cycles() to calculate execution time of 2 different loops, and
ast_vhub_dev_irq() is replaced with barrier() to avoid "noise"; below
are the results:
- when downstream port number is 5 and only 1 irq bit is set, it takes
~30 cycles to finish for_each_set_bit() loop, and 20-25 cycles to
finish the for() loop.
- if downstream port number is 5 and all 5 bits are set, then
for_each_set_bit() loop takes ~50 cycles and for() loop takes ~25
cycles.
- when I increase downsteam port number to 16 and set 1 irq bit, the
for_each_set_bit() loop takes ~30 cycles and for() loop takes 25
cycles. It's a little surprise to me because I thought for() loop
would cost 60+ cycles (3 times of the value when port number is 5).
- if downstream port number is 16 and all irq status bits are set,
then for_each_set_bit() loop takes 60-70 cycles and for() loop takes
30+ cycles.
Cheers,
Tao
>
> > >
> > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 12:14:30PM -0700, rentao.bupt@...il.com
> > > wrote:
> > > > From: Tao Ren <rentao.bupt@...il.com>
> > > >
> > > > This patch evaluates vhub ports' irq mask before going through per-
> > > > port
> > > > irq handling one by one, which helps to speed up irq handling in
> > > > case
> > > > there is no port interrupt.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tao Ren <rentao.bupt@...il.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > Changes in v3:
> > > > - assign istat to (unsigned long) bitmap before calling
> > > > "for_each_set_bit_from".
> > > > Changes in v2:
> > > > - use "for_each_set_bit" to speed up port irq handling.
> > > >
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/core.c | 12 +++++++++---
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/vhub.h | 8 +++-----
> > > > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/core.c
> > > > b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/core.c
> > > > index f8d35dd60c34..555e8645fb1e 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/core.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/core.c
> > > > @@ -134,11 +134,15 @@ static irqreturn_t ast_vhub_irq(int irq, void
> > > > *data)
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > /* Handle device interrupts */
> > > > - for (i = 0; i < vhub->max_ports; i++) {
> > > > - u32 dev_mask = VHUB_IRQ_DEVICE1 << i;
> > > > + if (istat & vhub->port_irq_mask) {
> > > > + unsigned long bitmap = istat;
> > > > + int offset = VHUB_IRQ_DEV1_BIT;
> > > > + int size = VHUB_IRQ_DEV1_BIT + vhub->max_ports;
> > > >
> > > > - if (istat & dev_mask)
> > > > + for_each_set_bit_from(offset, &bitmap, size) {
> > > > + i = offset - VHUB_IRQ_DEV1_BIT;
> > > > ast_vhub_dev_irq(&vhub->ports[i].dev);
> > > > + }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > /* Handle top-level vHub EP0 interrupts */
> > > > @@ -332,6 +336,8 @@ static int ast_vhub_probe(struct
> > > > platform_device *pdev)
> > > >
> > > > spin_lock_init(&vhub->lock);
> > > > vhub->pdev = pdev;
> > > > + vhub->port_irq_mask = GENMASK(VHUB_IRQ_DEV1_BIT + vhub-
> > > > >max_ports - 1,
> > > > + VHUB_IRQ_DEV1_BIT);
> > > >
> > > > res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> > > > vhub->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/vhub.h
> > > > b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/vhub.h
> > > > index fac79ef6d669..23a1ac91f8d2 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/vhub.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/vhub.h
> > > > @@ -51,14 +51,11 @@
> > > > #define VHUB_CTRL_UPSTREAM_CONNECT (1 << 0)
> > > >
> > > > /* IER & ISR */
> > > > +#define VHUB_IRQ_DEV1_BIT 9
> > > > #define VHUB_IRQ_USB_CMD_DEADLOCK (1 << 18)
> > > > #define VHUB_IRQ_EP_POOL_NAK (1 << 17)
> > > > #define VHUB_IRQ_EP_POOL_ACK_STALL (1 << 16)
> > > > -#define VHUB_IRQ_DEVICE5 (1 << 13)
> > > > -#define VHUB_IRQ_DEVICE4 (1 << 12)
> > > > -#define VHUB_IRQ_DEVICE3 (1 << 11)
> > > > -#define VHUB_IRQ_DEVICE2 (1 << 10)
> > > > -#define VHUB_IRQ_DEVICE1 (1 << 9)
> > > > +#define VHUB_IRQ_DEVICE1 (1 <<
> > > > (VHUB_IRQ_DEV1_BIT))
> > > > #define VHUB_IRQ_BUS_RESUME (1 << 8)
> > > > #define VHUB_IRQ_BUS_SUSPEND (1 << 7)
> > > > #define VHUB_IRQ_BUS_RESET (1 << 6)
> > > > @@ -402,6 +399,7 @@ struct ast_vhub {
> > > > /* Per-port info */
> > > > struct ast_vhub_port *ports;
> > > > u32 max_ports;
> > > > + u32 port_irq_mask;
> > > >
> > > > /* Generic EP data structures */
> > > > struct ast_vhub_ep *epns;
> > > > --
> > > > 2.17.1
> > > >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists