[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200407061646.pcglaw43kfmrag6a@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 08:16:46 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Oleksandr Suvorov <oleksandr.suvorov@...adex.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Paul Barker <pbarker@...sulko.com>,
Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>,
Igor Opaniuk <igor.opaniuk@...adex.com>,
Philippe Schenker <philippe.schenker@...adex.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: pwm: document the PWM no-flag
On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 10:22:42PM +0300, Oleksandr Suvorov wrote:
> Add the description of PWM_NOFLAGS flag property.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Suvorov <oleksandr.suvorov@...adex.com>
As I already wrote in reply to the v1 series I'd prefer a name for 0
that explicitly handles normal polarity.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists