[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200407101453.015096017@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 12:22:05 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 5.6 08/29] udp: initialize is_flist with 0 in udp_gro_receive
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit bde1b56f898ca8112912d7b36e55e1543b3be0cf ]
Without NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->is_flist initialized, when the dev doesn't
support NETIF_F_GRO_FRAGLIST, is_flist can still be set and fraglist
will be used in udp_gro_receive().
So fix it by initializing is_flist with 0 in udp_gro_receive.
Fixes: 9fd1ff5d2ac7 ("udp: Support UDP fraglist GRO/GSO.")
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Acked-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
@@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ struct sk_buff *udp_gro_receive(struct l
unsigned int off = skb_gro_offset(skb);
int flush = 1;
+ NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->is_flist = 0;
if (skb->dev->features & NETIF_F_GRO_FRAGLIST)
NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->is_flist = sk ? !udp_sk(sk)->gro_enabled: 1;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists