linux-kernel - Re: [v2] iio: core: move 'indio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d25190f18a171d82f3300f00b00f50f62f636d28.camel@analog.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Apr 2020 11:01:23 +0000
From:   "Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@...log.com>
To:     "Markus.Elfring@....de" <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
        "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v2] iio: core: move 'indio_dev->info' null check first

On Tue, 2020-04-07 at 12:42 +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> [External]
> 
> > So, over time I got the habit of mentioning 'Doesn't fix anything.'
> 
> I suggest to reconsider such information once more.
> We come along different interpretations for remarkable software adjustments.
> 
> 
> > if the patch doesn't fix anything.
> 
> Do you improve the input parameter validation a bit in principle here?

I thought that was obvious from the rest of the description + patch.
I guess it isn't.

I'll see.

> 
> Regards,
> Markus