[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200407110236.930134290@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 13:02:36 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: hch@...radead.org, sean.j.christopherson@...el.com,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
kenny@...ix.com, peterz@...radead.org, jeyu@...nel.org,
rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk, pbonzini@...hat.com,
fenghua.yu@...el.com, xiaoyao.li@...el.com, nadav.amit@...il.com,
thellstrom@...are.com, tony.luck@...el.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jannh@...gle.com,
keescook@...omium.org, David.Laight@...lab.com,
dcovelli@...are.com, mhiramat@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] x86/module: Out-of-tree module decode and sanitize
Hi all,
Driven by the SLD vs VMX interaction, here are some patches that provide means
to analyze the text of out-of-tree modules.
The first user of that is refusing to load modules on VMX-SLD conflicts, but it
also has a second patch that refulses to load any module that tries to modify
CRn/DRn.
I'm thinking people will quickly come up with more and more elaborate tests to
which to subject out-of-tree modules.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists