[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bb209f80-ac02-6321-dac4-ebf9ee6fa9a0@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 14:08:07 +0100
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To: saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org
Cc: mike.leach@...aro.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
leo.yan@...aro.org, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
swboyd@...omium.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] coresight: dynamic-replicator: Fix handling of
multiple connections
On 04/07/2020 12:29 PM, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> Hi Suzuki,
>
> Thanks for looking into this issue.
>
> On 2020-04-07 15:54, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> On 04/07/2020 10:46 AM, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
>>
>> There seems to be two replicators back to back here. What is connected
>> to the other output of both of them ? Are there any TPIUs ? What happens
>> if you choose a sink on the other end of "swao_replicator" (ETB ?)
>>
>
> The other outport of swao replicator is connected to EUD which is a
> QCOM specific HW which can be used as a sink like USB.
> And the other outport of other replicator(replicator_out) is connected to
> TPIU.
>
>> After boot, what do the idfilter registers read for both the
>> replicators ?
>>
>
> Added some prints in replicator_probe.
>
> replicator probe ret=-517 devname=6046000.replicator idfilter0=0x0
> idfilter1=0x0
> replicator probe ret=0 devname=6b06000.replicator idfilter0=0xff
> idfilter1=0xff
> replicator probe ret=0 devname=6046000.replicator idfilter0=0xff
> idfilter1=0xff
Curious to see how the idfilterX is set to 0:
if that is never used.
Or
if the user doesn't reset it back to 0xff.
Does your test ever touch EUD (enable the port for EUD at
swao-replicator) ? What are the values before you run your test ?
Suzuki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists