linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: mfd: add document bindings for mp2629

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e4412378-1423-a48e-9176-f0d48f6000c4@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Apr 2020 18:29:52 +0200
From:   saravanan sekar <sravanhome@...il.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, jic23@...nel.org, knaack.h@....de,
        lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net, sre@...nel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: mfd: add document bindings for mp2629

Hi Lee,

On 30/03/20 8:46 am, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Mar 2020, saravanan sekar wrote:
>> On 27/03/20 9:00 am, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Sun, 22 Mar 2020, Saravanan Sekar wrote:
>>>
>>>> Add device tree binding information for mp2629 mfd driver.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Saravanan Sekar <sravanhome@...il.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/mps,mp2629.yaml   | 60 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
>>>>    create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mps,mp2629.yaml
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mps,mp2629.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mps,mp2629.yaml
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..314309ea91ac
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mps,mp2629.yaml
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
>>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>>> +---
>>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/mps,mp2629.yaml#
>>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> Are these links supposed to work?
>> Not really, but as far my understanding needed for dt-bindings check
> Rob, why are these here if they just result in 404s?
>
>>>> +examples:
>>>> +  - |
>>>> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>>>> +    #include <dt-bindings/input/linux-event-codes.h>
>>>> +    i2c {
>>> i2c@...???????
>> Its a I2C controller node, I don't think address is needed. Mention like
>> this my previous other driver patches,
> This doesn't sound right.
>
> How do you control/operate the controller?
>
> Surely you read/write from/to registers?


Indeed, but each SoC will have different address so which address to 
mention here.
For me it should be like &i2c {}, anyhow I respect maintainers review (I 
can give RPi I2c bus address used for testing)
and wait for Rob's reply

>
>> dt_binding_check is also passed
>>
>>>> +        #address-cells = <1>;
>>>> +        #size-cells = <0>;
>>>> +
>>>> +        pmic@4b {
>>>> +            compatible = "mps,mp2629";
>>>> +            reg = <0x4b>;
>>>> +
>>>> +            interrupt-controller;
>>>> +            interrupt-parent = <&gpio2>;
>>>> +            #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>>>> +            interrupts = <3 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>>> +        };
>>>> +    };