[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200408085947.c48be95995fb6915bf16de88@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 08:59:47 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <hch@...radead.org>,
<sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<bp@...en8.de>, <hpa@...or.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<kenny@...ix.com>, <jeyu@...nel.org>, <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>,
<pbonzini@...hat.com>, <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
<xiaoyao.li@...el.com>, <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
<thellstrom@...are.com>, <tony.luck@...el.com>,
<rostedt@...dmis.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<jannh@...gle.com>, <keescook@...omium.org>,
<David.Laight@...lab.com>, <dcovelli@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86,module: Detect VMX vs SLD conflicts
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 18:16:58 +0100
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com> wrote:
> On 07/04/2020 17:51, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > diff --git a/tools/arch/x86/tools/gen-insn-attr-x86.awk b/tools/arch/x86/tools/gen-insn-attr-x86.awk
> > index d74d9e605723..ade80796453c 100644
> > --- a/tools/arch/x86/tools/gen-insn-attr-x86.awk
> > +++ b/tools/arch/x86/tools/gen-insn-attr-x86.awk
> > @@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ BEGIN {
> > mmx_expr = "^(emms|fxsave|fxrstor|ldmxcsr|stmxcsr)" # MMX/SSE nmemonics lacking operands
> > fpu_expr = "^x87"
> >
> > + vmx_expr = "^VM.*" # All mnemonic start with "VM" are VMX instructions
>
> Not really.
>
> VMMCALL, VMLOAD, VMSAVE and VMRUN are SVM instructions.
Here VMX will include SVM instructions. Would we need to distinguish them in this context?
(Or INAT_VIRT might be politically correct :) )
> VMASKMOV is a AVX instruction.
Good point. That instruction is written in lowercase "vmaskmov" in x86-opcode-map.txt.
(Maybe it is better to note it in x86-opcode-map.txt)
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists