linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARC: [plat-hsdk]: fix USB regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNAROwYx0tTR+euFcHCihbmEht6angCW_J0EZgSFvop5Fxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Apr 2020 10:04:18 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To:     Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>,
        "linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARC: [plat-hsdk]: fix USB regression

On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 1:22 AM Eugeniy Paltsev
<Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> I'm wondering what is proper way to deal with such type of regressions?
> Is is responsibility of person who change kconfig to check (and possibly adjust) affected defconfigs?


I think the patch submitter should take care of
affected defconfigs when (s)he drops select/imply.
Also, this kind of mistake should be caught
in the review process.



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada