[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200408110501.GS20713@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 13:05:01 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
jpoimboe@...hat.com, namit@...are.com, mhiramat@...nel.org,
jgross@...e.com, bp@...en8.de, vkuznets@...hat.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
mihai.carabas@...cle.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/26] x86/paravirt: Add runtime_patch()
On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 10:03:06PM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
> +/*
> + * preempt_enable_no_resched() so we don't add any preemption points until
> + * after the caller has returned.
> + */
> +#define preempt_enable_runtime_patch() preempt_enable_no_resched()
> +#define preempt_disable_runtime_patch() preempt_disable()
NAK, this is probably a stright preemption bug, also, afaict, there
aren't actually any users of this in the patch-set.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists