[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200408113631.GX20713@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 13:36:31 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
jpoimboe@...hat.com, namit@...are.com, mhiramat@...nel.org,
jgross@...e.com, bp@...en8.de, vkuznets@...hat.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
mihai.carabas@...cle.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 19/26] x86/alternatives: NMI safe runtime patching
On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 10:03:16PM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
> @@ -1807,12 +1911,20 @@ static int __maybe_unused text_poke_late(patch_worker_t worker, void *stage)
> text_poke_state.state = PATCH_SYNC_DONE; /* Start state */
> text_poke_state.primary_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>
> + text_poke_state.nmi_context = nmi;
> +
> + if (nmi)
> + register_nmi_handler(NMI_LOCAL, text_poke_nmi,
> + NMI_FLAG_FIRST, "text_poke_nmi");
> /*
> * Run the worker on all online CPUs. Don't need to do anything
> * for offline CPUs as they come back online with a clean cache.
> */
> ret = stop_machine(patch_worker, &text_poke_state, cpu_online_mask);
>
> + if (nmi)
> + unregister_nmi_handler(NMI_LOCAL, "text_poke_nmi");
> +
> return ret;
> }
This is completely bonghits crazy.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists