linux-kernel - [PATCH 22/28] mm: remove both instances of __vmalloc_node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200408115926.1467567-23-hch@lst.de>
Date:   Wed,  8 Apr 2020 13:59:20 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
Cc:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 22/28] mm: remove both instances of __vmalloc_node_flags

The real version just had a few callers that can open code it and
remove one layer of indirection.  The nommu stub was public but only
had a single caller, so remove it and avoid a CONFIG_MMU ifdef in
vmalloc.h.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
 include/linux/vmalloc.h |  9 ---------
 mm/nommu.c              |  3 ++-
 mm/vmalloc.c            | 20 ++++++--------------
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/vmalloc.h b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
index c1b9d6eca05f..4a46d296e70d 100644
--- a/include/linux/vmalloc.h
+++ b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
@@ -115,17 +115,8 @@ extern void *__vmalloc_node_range(unsigned long size, unsigned long align,
 			unsigned long start, unsigned long end, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 			pgprot_t prot, unsigned long vm_flags, int node,
 			const void *caller);
-#ifndef CONFIG_MMU
-extern void *__vmalloc_node_flags(unsigned long size, int node, gfp_t flags);
-static inline void *__vmalloc_node_flags_caller(unsigned long size, int node,
-						gfp_t flags, void *caller)
-{
-	return __vmalloc_node_flags(size, node, flags);
-}
-#else
 extern void *__vmalloc_node_flags_caller(unsigned long size,
 					 int node, gfp_t flags, void *caller);
-#endif
 
 extern void vfree(const void *addr);
 extern void vfree_atomic(const void *addr);
diff --git a/mm/nommu.c b/mm/nommu.c
index 2df549adb22b..9553efa59787 100644
--- a/mm/nommu.c
+++ b/mm/nommu.c
@@ -150,7 +150,8 @@ void *__vmalloc(unsigned long size, gfp_t gfp_mask)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__vmalloc);
 
-void *__vmalloc_node_flags(unsigned long size, int node, gfp_t flags)
+void *__vmalloc_node_flags_caller(unsigned long size, int node, gfp_t flags,
+		void *caller)
 {
 	return __vmalloc(size, flags);
 }
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index de7952959e82..3d59d848ad48 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2566,14 +2566,6 @@ void *__vmalloc(unsigned long size, gfp_t gfp_mask)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__vmalloc);
 
-static inline void *__vmalloc_node_flags(unsigned long size,
-					int node, gfp_t flags)
-{
-	return __vmalloc_node(size, 1, flags, node,
-				__builtin_return_address(0));
-}
-
-
 void *__vmalloc_node_flags_caller(unsigned long size, int node, gfp_t flags,
 				  void *caller)
 {
@@ -2594,8 +2586,8 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_flags_caller(unsigned long size, int node, gfp_t flags,
  */
 void *vmalloc(unsigned long size)
 {
-	return __vmalloc_node_flags(size, NUMA_NO_NODE,
-				    GFP_KERNEL);
+	return __vmalloc_node(size, 1, GFP_KERNEL, NUMA_NO_NODE,
+				__builtin_return_address(0));
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc);
 
@@ -2614,8 +2606,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc);
  */
 void *vzalloc(unsigned long size)
 {
-	return __vmalloc_node_flags(size, NUMA_NO_NODE,
-				GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
+	return __vmalloc_node(size, 1, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, NUMA_NO_NODE,
+				__builtin_return_address(0));
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(vzalloc);
 
@@ -2670,8 +2662,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_node);
  */
 void *vzalloc_node(unsigned long size, int node)
 {
-	return __vmalloc_node_flags(size, node,
-			 GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
+	return __vmalloc_node(size, 1, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, node,
+				__builtin_return_address(0));
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(vzalloc_node);
 
-- 
2.25.1