| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 14:38:21 +0200
From: <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To: "'Stanimir Varbanov'" <svarbanov@...sol.com>,
"'Andy Gross'" <agross@...nel.org>
Cc: "'Bjorn Andersson'" <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
"'Bjorn Helgaas'" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"'Rob Herring'" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"'Mark Rutland'" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"'Lorenzo Pieralisi'" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
"'Andrew Murray'" <amurray@...goodpenguin.co.uk>,
"'Philipp Zabel'" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: R: [PATCH v2 07/10] PCIe: qcom: fix init problem with missing PARF programming
> PARF programming
>
> Hi Ansuel,
>
> Please fix the patch subject for all patches in the series per Bjorn H.
> request.
>
> PCI: qcom: Fix init problem with missing PARF programming
>
> Also the patch subject is misleading to me. Actually you change few phy
> parameters: Tx De-Emphasis, Tx Swing and Rx equalization. On the other
> side I guess those parameters are board specific and I'm not sure how
> this change will reflect on apq8064 boards.
>
I also think that this would brake apq8064, on ipq8064 this is needed or
the system doesn't boot.
Should I move this to the dts and set this params only if they are present
in dts or also here check for compatible and set accordingly?
> On 4/2/20 3:11 PM, Ansuel Smith wrote:
> > PARF programming was missing and this cause initilizzation problem on
> > some ipq806x based device (Netgear R7800 for example). This cause a
> > total lock of the system on kernel load.
> >
> > Fixes: 82a82383 PCI: qcom: Add Qualcomm PCIe controller driver
> > Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++--
> ---
> > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > index 211a1aa7d0f1..77b1ab7e23a3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@
> >
> > #define PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL 0x40
> > #define PCIE20_PARF_PHY_REFCLK 0x4C
> > +#define REF_SSP_EN BIT(16)
> > +#define REF_USE_PAD BIT(12)
>
> Could you rename this to:
>
> PHY_REFCLK_SSP_EN
> PHY_REFCLK_USE_PAD
>
> > +
> > #define PCIE20_PARF_DBI_BASE_ADDR 0x168
> > #define PCIE20_PARF_SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE 0x16C
> > #define PCIE20_PARF_MHI_CLOCK_RESET_CTRL 0x174
> > @@ -77,6 +80,18 @@
> > #define DBI_RO_WR_EN 1
> >
> > #define PERST_DELAY_US 1000
> > +/* PARF registers */
> > +#define PCIE20_PARF_PCS_DEEMPH 0x34
> > +#define PCS_DEEMPH_TX_DEEMPH_GEN1(x) (x << 16)
> > +#define PCS_DEEMPH_TX_DEEMPH_GEN2_3_5DB(x) (x << 8)
> > +#define PCS_DEEMPH_TX_DEEMPH_GEN2_6DB(x) (x << 0)
> > +
> > +#define PCIE20_PARF_PCS_SWING 0x38
> > +#define PCS_SWING_TX_SWING_FULL(x) (x << 8)
> > +#define PCS_SWING_TX_SWING_LOW(x) (x << 0)
> > +
> > +#define PCIE20_PARF_CONFIG_BITS 0x50
> > +#define PHY_RX0_EQ(x) (x << 24)
> >
> > #define PCIE20_v3_PARF_SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE 0x358
> > #define SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SZ 0x10000000
> > @@ -184,6 +199,16 @@ struct qcom_pcie {
> >
> > #define to_qcom_pcie(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
> >
> > +static inline void qcom_clear_and_set_dword(void __iomem *addr,
>
> drop 'inline' the compiler is smart enough to decide.
>
> > + u32 clear_mask, u32 set_mask)
> > +{
> > + u32 val = readl(addr);
> > +
> > + val &= ~clear_mask;
> > + val |= set_mask;
> > + writel(val, addr);
> > +}
> > +
>
> If you add such function you should introduce it in a separate patch and
> use it in the whole driver where it is applicable. After that we can see
> what is the benefit of it.
>
> > static void qcom_ep_reset_assert(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> > {
> > gpiod_set_value_cansleep(pcie->reset, 1);
> > @@ -304,7 +329,6 @@ static int qcom_pcie_init_2_1_0(struct
> qcom_pcie *pcie)
> > struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_1_0 *res = &pcie->res.v2_1_0;
> > struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> > struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> > - u32 val;
> > int ret;
> >
> > ret = regulator_bulk_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(res->supplies), res-
> >supplies);
> > @@ -355,15 +379,21 @@ static int qcom_pcie_init_2_1_0(struct
> qcom_pcie *pcie)
> > goto err_deassert_ahb;
> > }
> >
> > - /* enable PCIe clocks and resets */
> > - val = readl(pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL);
> > - val &= ~BIT(0);
> > - writel(val, pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL);
> > + qcom_clear_and_set_dword(pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL,
> BIT(0), 0);
>
> please keep the comment.
>
> > +
> > + /* PARF programming */
>
> pointless comment, please drop it.
>
> > + writel(PCS_DEEMPH_TX_DEEMPH_GEN1(0x18) |
> > + PCS_DEEMPH_TX_DEEMPH_GEN2_3_5DB(0x18) |
> > + PCS_DEEMPH_TX_DEEMPH_GEN2_6DB(0x22),
> > + pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_PCS_DEEMPH);
> > + writel(PCS_SWING_TX_SWING_FULL(0x78) |
> > + PCS_SWING_TX_SWING_LOW(0x78),
> > + pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_PCS_SWING);
> > + writel(PHY_RX0_EQ(0x4), pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_CONFIG_BITS);
> >
> > - /* enable external reference clock */
> > - val = readl(pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_PHY_REFCLK);
> > - val |= BIT(16);
> > - writel(val, pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_PHY_REFCLK);
> > + /* enable reference clock */
>
> Why you dropped 'external' ?
>
> > + qcom_clear_and_set_dword(pcie->parf +
> PCIE20_PARF_PHY_REFCLK,
> > + REF_USE_PAD, REF_SSP_EN);
> >
> > ret = reset_control_deassert(res->phy_reset);
> > if (ret) {
> >
>
> --
> regards,
> Stan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists