lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200408141915.GJ3103@8bytes.org>
Date:   Wed, 8 Apr 2020 16:19:15 +0200
From:   Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:     Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Cc:     iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] iommu/amd: fix a race in fetch_pte()

Hi Qian,

On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 11:36:05AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> After further testing, the change along is insufficient. What I am chasing right
> now is the swap device will go offline after heavy memory pressure below. The
> symptom is similar to what we have in the commit,
> 
> 754265bcab78 (“iommu/amd: Fix race in increase_address_space()”)
> 
> Apparently, it is no possible to take the domain->lock in fetch_pte() because it
> could sleep.

Thanks a lot for finding and tracking down another race in the AMD IOMMU
page-table code.  The domain->lock is a spin-lock and taking it can't
sleep. But fetch_pte() is a fast-path and must not take any locks.

I think the best fix is to update the pt_root and mode of the domain
atomically by storing the mode in the lower 12 bits of pt_root. This way
they are stored together and can be read/write atomically.

Regards,

	Joerg

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ