linux-kernel - [PATCH bpf] arm: bpf: Fix bugs with ALU64 {RSH, ARSH} BPF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200408181229.10909-1-luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed,  8 Apr 2020 18:12:29 +0000
From:   Luke Nelson <lukenels@...washington.edu>
To:     bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@...il.com>, Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>,
        Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf] arm: bpf: Fix bugs with ALU64 {RSH, ARSH} BPF_K shift by 0

The current arm BPF JIT does not correctly compile RSH or ARSH when the
immediate shift amount is 0. This causes the "rsh64 by 0 imm" and "arsh64
by 0 imm" BPF selftests to hang the kernel by reaching an instruction
the verifier determines to be unreachable.

The root cause is in how immediate right shifts are encoded on arm.
For LSR and ASR (logical and arithmetic right shift), a bit-pattern
of 00000 in the immediate encodes a shift amount of 32. When the BPF
immediate is 0, the generated code shifts by 32 instead of the expected
behavior (a no-op).

This patch fixes the bugs by adding an additional check if the BPF
immediate is 0. After the change, the above mentioned BPF selftests pass.

Fixes: 39c13c204bb11 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler")
Co-developed-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@...il.com>
---
 arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
index cc29869d12a3..d124f78e20ac 100644
--- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
+++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
@@ -929,7 +929,11 @@ static inline void emit_a32_rsh_i64(const s8 dst[],
 	rd = arm_bpf_get_reg64(dst, tmp, ctx);
 
 	/* Do LSR operation */
-	if (val < 32) {
+	if (val == 0) {
+		/* An immediate value of 0 encodes a shift amount of 32
+		 * for LSR. To shift by 0, don't do anything.
+		 */
+	} else if (val < 32) {
 		emit(ARM_MOV_SI(tmp2[1], rd[1], SRTYPE_LSR, val), ctx);
 		emit(ARM_ORR_SI(rd[1], tmp2[1], rd[0], SRTYPE_ASL, 32 - val), ctx);
 		emit(ARM_MOV_SI(rd[0], rd[0], SRTYPE_LSR, val), ctx);
@@ -955,7 +959,11 @@ static inline void emit_a32_arsh_i64(const s8 dst[],
 	rd = arm_bpf_get_reg64(dst, tmp, ctx);
 
 	/* Do ARSH operation */
-	if (val < 32) {
+	if (val == 0) {
+		/* An immediate value of 0 encodes a shift amount of 32
+		 * for ASR. To shift by 0, don't do anything.
+		 */
+	} else if (val < 32) {
 		emit(ARM_MOV_SI(tmp2[1], rd[1], SRTYPE_LSR, val), ctx);
 		emit(ARM_ORR_SI(rd[1], tmp2[1], rd[0], SRTYPE_ASL, 32 - val), ctx);
 		emit(ARM_MOV_SI(rd[0], rd[0], SRTYPE_ASR, val), ctx);
-- 
2.17.1