[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200409100726.GB17293@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 13:07:26 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...el.com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@...el.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...s.com>,
Steve Winslow <swinslow@...il.com>,
Richard Fontana <rfontana@...hat.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, oprofile-list@...ts.sf.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] MIPS: ip27: Fix includes
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 05:38:35PM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 12:19:22 +0300
> Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 08:59:54PM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> > > Somehow changes in topology messed up headers.
> > > So just add necessary headers to make it compile again.
> >
> > Please avoid aftermath build fixes because it breaks bisection.
> > Each commit should be buildable, so this changes should go into the
> > patches that actually require them.
>
> I'd love to but for that I'll have to squash patch #5~#12 into a single
> patch. T thought it's to big and touching too many files.
>
> Is that acceptable?
If I understand correctly, the patches #5-#12 replace custom MIPS
implementation of CPU topology with a generic one, so making them a single
patch could be Ok as it is single logical change.
But I'm not sure it is required. Judging by diffstat, my guess would be
that patch #5 breaks ip27 builds. If that's true, only patch #5 should be
redacted
> Thanks.
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
> > > ---
> --
> Jiaxun Yang
>
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists