[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxgTtbb-vDQNnY1_7EzQ=p5p2MqkfyZo2zkFQ1Wv29uqCA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 13:23:29 +0300
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
overlayfs <linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Monakhov <dmtrmonakhov@...dex-team.ru>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ovl: skip overlayfs superblocks at global sync
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:30 AM Konstantin Khlebnikov
<khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru> wrote:
>
> Stacked filesystems like overlayfs has no own writeback, but they have to
> forward syncfs() requests to backend for keeping data integrity.
>
> During global sync() each overlayfs instance calls method ->sync_fs()
> for backend although it itself is in global list of superblocks too.
> As a result one syscall sync() could write one superblock several times
> and send multiple disk barriers.
>
> This patch adds flag SB_I_SKIP_SYNC into sb->sb_iflags to avoid that.
>
> Reported-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmtrmonakhov@...dex-team.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
> ---
Seems reasonable.
You may add:
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
+CC: containers list
This bring up old memories.
I posted this way back to fix handling of emergency_remount() in the
presence of loop mounted fs:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/CAA2m6vfatWKS1CQFpaRbii2AXiZFvQUjVvYhGxWTSpz+2rxDyg@mail.gmail.com/
But seems to me that emergency_sync() and sync(2) are equally broken
for this use case.
I wonder if anyone cares enough about resilience of loop mounted fs to try
and change the iterate_* functions to iterate supers/bdevs in reverse order...
Thanks,
Amir.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists