[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200409112742.3581-1-qais.yousef@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 12:27:40 +0100
From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Todd E Brandt <todd.e.brandt@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Revert "cpu/hotplug: Ignore pm_wakeup_pending() for disable_nonboot_cpus()"
This issue was fixed already by:
commit d66b16f5df4b ("arm64: Don't use disable_nonboot_cpus()")
commit dddf3578e0d4 ("ARM: Don't use disable_nonboot_cpus()")
The only caller of disable_nonboot_cpus() is x86, which is in a proper
suspend/resume path and due to the reverted patch lost its ability to
early abort due to a pending wakeup.
The fix that is being reverted is arguably a better one to backport to
stable trees. But it highlights the confusion about using
disable_nonboot_cpus() API.
This is a preparation to remove disable_nonboot_cpus() in favor of
freeze_secondary_cpus().
This reverts commit e98eac6ff1b45e4e73f2e6031b37c256ccb5d36b.
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
CC: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: x86@...nel.org
CC: Todd E Brandt <todd.e.brandt@...ux.intel.com>
CC: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
---
include/linux/cpu.h | 12 +++---------
kernel/cpu.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpu.h b/include/linux/cpu.h
index beaed2dc269e..9ead281157d3 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpu.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpu.h
@@ -144,18 +144,12 @@ static inline void get_online_cpus(void) { cpus_read_lock(); }
static inline void put_online_cpus(void) { cpus_read_unlock(); }
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_SMP
-int __freeze_secondary_cpus(int primary, bool suspend);
-static inline int freeze_secondary_cpus(int primary)
-{
- return __freeze_secondary_cpus(primary, true);
-}
-
+extern int freeze_secondary_cpus(int primary);
static inline int disable_nonboot_cpus(void)
{
- return __freeze_secondary_cpus(0, false);
+ return freeze_secondary_cpus(0);
}
-
-void enable_nonboot_cpus(void);
+extern void enable_nonboot_cpus(void);
static inline int suspend_disable_secondary_cpus(void)
{
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 12ae636e9cb6..30848496cbc7 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -1327,7 +1327,7 @@ void bringup_nonboot_cpus(unsigned int setup_max_cpus)
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_SMP
static cpumask_var_t frozen_cpus;
-int __freeze_secondary_cpus(int primary, bool suspend)
+int freeze_secondary_cpus(int primary)
{
int cpu, error = 0;
@@ -1352,7 +1352,7 @@ int __freeze_secondary_cpus(int primary, bool suspend)
if (cpu == primary)
continue;
- if (suspend && pm_wakeup_pending()) {
+ if (pm_wakeup_pending()) {
pr_info("Wakeup pending. Abort CPU freeze\n");
error = -EBUSY;
break;
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists