linux-kernel - Re: (EXT) Re: [PATCH 1/4] pwm: pca9685: remove unused duty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 9 Apr 2020 07:42:05 -0400
From:   Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@...ruber.com>,
        Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: (EXT) Re: [PATCH 1/4] pwm: pca9685: remove unused duty_cycle
 struct element

On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 5:51 AM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
>
> There are other chips where a single period is shared across multiple
> PWM channels. Typically what we do there is once a period is configured
> for a given channel, all subsequent PWM channel configurations must use
> the same period, or otherwise the driver will return an error code.

Thank you for the clarification Thierry. Do you think this method would be
appropriate for this chip?