linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] selftests: kvm: Add mem_slot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0009f75a-4c09-139e-c793-574291ad20dc@oracle.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Apr 2020 18:31:05 -0700
From:   Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com>
To:     Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wainersm@...hat.com>,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     drjones@...hat.com, david@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] selftests: kvm: Add mem_slot_test test


On 4/8/20 3:08 PM, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote:
> This patch introduces the mem_slot_test test which checks
> an VM can have added memory slots up to the limit defined in
> KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS. Then attempt to add one more slot to
> verify it fails as expected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wainersm@...hat.com>
> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore      |  1 +
>   tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile        |  3 +
>   tools/testing/selftests/kvm/mem_slot_test.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 80 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/mem_slot_test.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
> index 16877c3daabf..127d27188427 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
> @@ -21,4 +21,5 @@
>   /demand_paging_test
>   /dirty_log_test
>   /kvm_create_max_vcpus
> +/mem_slot_test
>   /steal_time
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> index 712a2ddd2a27..338b6cdce1a0 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> @@ -32,12 +32,14 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += clear_dirty_log_test
>   TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += demand_paging_test
>   TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += dirty_log_test
>   TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += kvm_create_max_vcpus
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += mem_slot_test
>   TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += steal_time
>   
>   TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += clear_dirty_log_test
>   TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += demand_paging_test
>   TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += dirty_log_test
>   TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += kvm_create_max_vcpus
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += mem_slot_test
>   TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += steal_time
>   
>   TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x = s390x/memop
> @@ -46,6 +48,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += s390x/sync_regs_test
>   TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += demand_paging_test
>   TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += dirty_log_test
>   TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += kvm_create_max_vcpus
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += mem_slot_test
>   
>   TEST_GEN_PROGS += $(TEST_GEN_PROGS_$(UNAME_M))
>   LIBKVM += $(LIBKVM_$(UNAME_M))
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/mem_slot_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/mem_slot_test.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7c1009f0bc07
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/mem_slot_test.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * mem_slot_test
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2020, Red Hat, Inc.
> + *
> + * Test suite for memory region operations.
> + */
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE /* for program_invocation_short_name */
> +#include <linux/kvm.h>
> +#include <sys/mman.h>
> +
> +#include "test_util.h"
> +#include "kvm_util.h"
> +
> +/*
> + * Test it can be added memory slots up to KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS, then any
> + * tentative to add further slots should fail.
> + */
> +static void test_add_max_slots(void)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	struct kvm_vm *vm;
> +	uint32_t max_mem_slots;
> +	uint32_t slot;
> +	uint64_t guest_addr;
> +	uint64_t mem_reg_npages;
> +	uint64_t mem_reg_size;
> +	void *mem;
> +
> +	max_mem_slots = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS);
> +	TEST_ASSERT(max_mem_slots > 0,
> +		    "KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS should be greater than 0");
> +	pr_info("Allowed number of memory slots: %i\n", max_mem_slots);
> +
> +	vm = vm_create(VM_MODE_DEFAULT, 0, O_RDWR);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Uses 1MB sized/aligned memory region since this is the minimal
> +	 * required on s390x.
> +	 */
> +	mem_reg_size = 0x100000;
> +	mem_reg_npages = vm_calc_num_guest_pages(VM_MODE_DEFAULT, mem_reg_size);
> +
> +	guest_addr = 0x0;


Nit: Can't this be initialized where it's defined above ?

> +
> +	/* Check it can be added memory slots up to the maximum allowed */
> +	pr_info("Adding slots 0..%i, each memory region with %ldK size\n",
> +		(max_mem_slots - 1), mem_reg_size >> 10);
> +	for (slot = 0; slot < max_mem_slots; slot++) {
> +		vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS,
> +					    guest_addr, slot, mem_reg_npages,
> +					    0);
> +		guest_addr += mem_reg_size;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Check it cannot be added memory slots beyond the limit */
> +	mem = mmap(NULL, mem_reg_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> +		   MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
> +	TEST_ASSERT(mem != MAP_FAILED, "Failed to mmap() host");
> +
> +	ret = ioctl(vm_get_fd(vm), KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION,
> +		    &(struct kvm_userspace_memory_region) {slot, 0, guest_addr,
> +		    mem_reg_size, (uint64_t) mem});
> +	TEST_ASSERT(ret == -1 && errno == EINVAL,
> +		    "Adding one more memory slot should fail with EINVAL");


Why not add a test here for adding memory at an existing slot ?

> +
> +	munmap(mem, mem_reg_size);
> +	kvm_vm_free(vm);
> +}
> +
> +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> +{
> +	test_add_max_slots();
> +	return 0;
> +}