lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200409140331.GK18386@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Thu, 9 Apr 2020 16:03:31 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc:     Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Sandeep Patil <sspatil@...roid.com>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
        OTC LSE PnP <otc.lse.pnp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [mm]  6471384af2:
 phoronix-test-suite.darktable.Masskrug.CPU-only.seconds 10.2% regression

On Thu 09-04-20 21:50:29, kernel test robot wrote:
> Greeting,
> 
> FYI, we noticed a 10.2% regression of phoronix-test-suite.darktable.Masskrug.CPU-only.seconds due to commit:
> 
> 
> commit: 6471384af2a6530696fc0203bafe4de41a23c9ef ("mm: security: introduce init_on_alloc=1 and init_on_free=1 boot options")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
[...]
> CONFIG_INIT_ON_ALLOC_DEFAULT_ON=y
> CONFIG_INIT_ON_FREE_DEFAULT_ON=y

So the feature is enabled by default and therefore this is no
regression. The feature is expected to have an overhead. It is nice to
see that quantified. These numbers roughly match those presented when
the feature was enabled.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ