linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull proc and exec work for 5.7-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AM6PR03MB5170F924EA69A81D79BD0929E4C10@AM6PR03MB5170.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Apr 2020 19:46:17 +0200
From:   Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@...mail.de>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@...il.com>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull proc and exec work for 5.7-rc1



On 4/9/20 7:37 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 10:17 AM Bernd Edlinger
> <bernd.edlinger@...mail.de> wrote:
>>
>> Just for reference, I used Oleg's test case,
>> and improved it a bit.
> 
> I'm sure the test-case got posted somewhere, but mind sending it to me
> (or just pointing me at it?)
> 


No problem looks like you already swallowed the hook :-)
look at the following commit in your tree:

commit 2de4e82318c7f9d34f4b08599a612cd4cd10bf0b
Author: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@...mail.de>
Date:   Fri Mar 20 21:26:19 2020 +0100

    selftests/ptrace: add test cases for dead-locks
    
    This adds test cases for ptrace deadlocks.
    
    Additionally fixes a compile problem in get_syscall_info.c,
    observed with gcc-4.8.4:
    
    get_syscall_info.c: In function 'get_syscall_info':
    get_syscall_info.c:93:3: error: 'for' loop initial declarations are only
                                     allowed in C99 mode
       for (unsigned int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(args); ++i) {
       ^
    get_syscall_info.c:93:3: note: use option -std=c99 or -std=gnu99 to compile
                                   your code
    
    Signed-off-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@...mail.de>
    Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
    Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>


Test case 1/2 is working 2/2 is failing, deadlocking,
I think even the time-out handler does not kill the dead-lock
if I remember correctly.

And sorry, I anticipated part 15/16 and 16/16 would be pulled at the
same time, so the glitch would not be visible by now.


Bernd.

>              Linus
>