[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200409202751.GA7976@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 13:27:51 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm: Two small fixes for recent syzbot reports
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 12:58:48PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 12:56 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > We should probably give Stephen a cc here ...
>
> Heh. I already did, but then that got broken because Andrew had lost
> that part of the thread and the discussion re-started.
>
> So Stephen was already cc'd for my original request to have linux-next
> kick things out aggressively.
>
Well, if (for example) we look at
"linux-next test error: WARNING: suspicious RCU usage in ovs_ct_exit"
(https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/000000000000e642a905a0cbee6e@google.com/),
it was sent to the maintainers of net/openvswitch/ where the warning occurred.
It was then ignored.
Would it help if bugs blocking testing on linux-next were Cc'ed to
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, so that Stephen could investigate?
FWIW, the issue of "syzbot report sent and ignored for months/years" is actually
a much broader one which applies to all bugs, not just build / test breakages.
There are tons of open bugs on https://syzkaller.appspot.com/upstream which are
definitely still valid (sort by "Last" occurred). Long-term, to fix this we
really need syzbot to start sending reminders. But first there's work needed to
make the noise level low enough so that people don't just tune them out.
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists