[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MW2PR2101MB10525BA673D7FA81073B9F65D7C10@MW2PR2101MB1052.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 23:06:13 +0000
From: Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
CC: "ltykernel@...il.com" <ltykernel@...il.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <liuwe@...rosoft.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
vkuznets <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V4 6/6] x86/Hyper-V: Report crash data in die() when
panic_on_oops is set
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org> Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2020 9:41 AM
>
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 08:19:47PM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote:
> > From: Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com> Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 8:54 AM
> > >
> > > When oops happens with panic_on_oops unset, the oops
> > > thread is killed by die() and system continues to run.
> > > In such case, guest should not report crash register
> > > data to host since system still runs. Check panic_on_oops
> > > and return directly in hyperv_report_panic() when the function
> > > is called in the die() and panic_on_oops is unset. Fix it.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 7ed4325a44ea ("Drivers: hv: vmbus: Make panic reporting to be more useful")
> > > Signed-off-by: Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>
> > > ---
> > > Change since v3:
> > > - Fix compile error.
> > > - Add fix commit in the change log
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c | 6 +++++-
> > > drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c | 5 +++--
> > > include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h | 2 +-
> > > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
>
> It seems to me only the last patch is new, others are already in my
> tree, so I only apply the last one.
>
> Let me know if my understanding is wrong.
>
Tianyu added "Fixes:" tags to some of the other patches in
the series. It appears the version you had already queued doesn't
have those "Fixes:" tags.
Michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists