[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44b4aa3d-0d3b-c10a-7d79-5fcc4d76fe98@web.de>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:18:23 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+fc0674cde00b66844470@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: crypto: api - Fix use-after-free and race in crypto_spawn_alg
> Secondly the setting of the DYING flag is racy because we hold
> the read-lock instead of the write-lock. We should instead call
Would an imperative wording be preferred for this change description?
> This patch fixes both problems.
Will another wording alternative become relevant?
Are the provided tags sufficient for such information?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists