[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0c9796c5-95fe-0349-d128-393da9b344d6@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 13:26:25 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amit.kucheria@...durent.com,
"open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] thermal: core: Move thermal_cdev_update next to
updated=false
On 10/04/2020 12:14, Zhang Rui wrote:
> Hi, Daniel,
>
> On Thu, 2020-04-09 at 17:15 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> The call to the thermal_cdev_update() function is done after browsing
>> the thermal instances which sets the updated flag by browsing them
>> again.
>>
>> Instead of doing this, let's move the call right after setting the
>> cooling device 'updated' flag as it is done in the other governors.
>
> The reason we do this in two steps is that we want to avoid redundant
> cooling device state changes.
>
> Further more, I think it is better to move the thermal_cdev_update out
> of .throllte() callback, to thermal_zone_device_update(). So that we do
> not need to update the cooling device for each trip point.
>
> is there any specific reason we need to do thermal_cdev_update() for
> every potential change?
I agree we can go further and move the cooling device update in the
thermal_zone_device_update() by letting the throttle callback let us
know an update is needed with the return value.
Makes sense to provide more changes on top of those two patches ?
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/thermal/gov_bang_bang.c | 10 +---------
>> drivers/thermal/step_wise.c | 10 +---------
>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/gov_bang_bang.c
>> b/drivers/thermal/gov_bang_bang.c
>> index 991a1c54296d..c292a69845bb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/gov_bang_bang.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/gov_bang_bang.c
>> @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ static void thermal_zone_trip_update(struct
>> thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
>> mutex_lock(&instance->cdev->lock);
>> instance->cdev->updated = false; /* cdev needs update
>> */
>> mutex_unlock(&instance->cdev->lock);
>> + thermal_cdev_update(instance->cdev);
>> }
>>
>> mutex_unlock(&tz->lock);
>> @@ -98,17 +99,8 @@ static void thermal_zone_trip_update(struct
>> thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
>> */
>> static int bang_bang_control(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int
>> trip)
>> {
>> - struct thermal_instance *instance;
>> -
>> thermal_zone_trip_update(tz, trip);
>>
>> - mutex_lock(&tz->lock);
>> -
>> - list_for_each_entry(instance, &tz->thermal_instances, tz_node)
>> - thermal_cdev_update(instance->cdev);
>> -
>> - mutex_unlock(&tz->lock);
>> -
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
>> b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
>> index 2ae7198d3067..298eedac0293 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
>> @@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ static void thermal_zone_trip_update(struct
>> thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
>> mutex_lock(&instance->cdev->lock);
>> instance->cdev->updated = false; /* cdev needs update
>> */
>> mutex_unlock(&instance->cdev->lock);
>> + thermal_cdev_update(instance->cdev);
>> }
>>
>> mutex_unlock(&tz->lock);
>> @@ -185,20 +186,11 @@ static void thermal_zone_trip_update(struct
>> thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
>> */
>> static int step_wise_throttle(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int
>> trip)
>> {
>> - struct thermal_instance *instance;
>> -
>> thermal_zone_trip_update(tz, trip);
>>
>> if (tz->forced_passive)
>> thermal_zone_trip_update(tz, THERMAL_TRIPS_NONE);
>>
>> - mutex_lock(&tz->lock);
>> -
>> - list_for_each_entry(instance, &tz->thermal_instances, tz_node)
>> - thermal_cdev_update(instance->cdev);
>> -
>> - mutex_unlock(&tz->lock);
>> -
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists