linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm: Two small fixes for recent syzbot reports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200410102609.245f93639ece2667c3f70e5c@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 10 Apr 2020 10:26:09 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Cc:     Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm: Two small fixes for recent syzbot reports

On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 10:26:23 -0400 Qian Cai <cai@....pw> wrote:

> I don't set panic_on_warn. I'll deal with warnings afterwards.

I'm not understanding why sysbot sets panic_on_warn.  This decision
will needlessly turn many kernel errors into wont-boot situations and
will block further testing?