lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 10 Apr 2020 22:45:27 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>,
        thierry.reding@...il.com, jonathanh@...dia.com, frankc@...dia.com,
        hverkuil@...all.nl, sakari.ailus@....fi, helen.koike@...labora.com
Cc:     sboyd@...nel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 6/9] media: tegra: Add Tegra210 Video input driver

10.04.2020 21:59, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
...
>> It's still not clear to me how the "pre-queued buffers" will be limited.
>> I'll take another look at the v7.
> 
> OK, but I don't understand what you mean by limit on pre-queued buffers.
> 
> I was saying vb2 queue has min_buffers_needed which was set to 3 where
> streaming will start only after 3 buffers got queued up.
> 
> Regarding outstanding condition check to make sure no more than 2 syncpt
> trigger requests are in FIFO I added it to be safe where mostly we may
> not hit and also I only see capture start thread holding for it during
> initial frame capture as it issues single shot for 1st 2 buffers capture
> and holds 3 buffers which is already queued till at least one of those 2
> issued capture is done to make sure of not triggering syncpt condition
> when fifo already has 2 pending.
> 
> In v7, will remove setting min_buffers_needed and also outstanding
> syncpt trigger check.

Okay, seems I got what you're saying. Yes, the check should be removed.
It's impossible to get the frame-start event while capture of the
previous buffer is in-progress.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ