[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wixvbCie+EQ-vTPdyrzmdopM_BQc=uetneuSSa7PtCt2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 13:25:47 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
matthew.auld@...el.com, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: Linus, please revert 7dc8f11437: regression in 5.7-rc0, hangs
while attempting to run X
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 12:48 AM Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
>
> >
> > Beyond the fix already submitted?
>
> I did not get that one, can I have a pointer?
What's the status of this one?
I'm assuming the fix is commit 721017cf4bd8 ("drm/i915/gem: Ignore
readonly failures when updating relics"), but didn't see a reply to
the query or a confirmation of things working..
Btw, Chris, that __put_user() not testing the error should at least
have a comment. We don't have a working "__must_check" for those
things (because they are subtle macros, not functions), but if we did,
we'd get a compiler warning for not checking the error value.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists