[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200411230706.23855-18-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 19:05:23 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.5 018/121] selftests/bpf: Fix test_progs's parsing of test numbers
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
[ Upstream commit fc32490bff855a539d253c8a52c5a1ba51d1325a ]
When specifying disjoint set of tests, test_progs doesn't set skipped test's
array elements to false. This leads to spurious execution of tests that should
have been skipped. Fix it by explicitly initializing them to false.
Fixes: 3a516a0a3a7b ("selftests/bpf: add sub-tests support for test_progs")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200314013932.4035712-2-andriin@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
index 7fa7d08a8104d..849c1e8b8e3dc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static int libbpf_print_fn(enum libbpf_print_level level,
int parse_num_list(const char *s, struct test_selector *sel)
{
- int i, set_len = 0, num, start = 0, end = -1;
+ int i, set_len = 0, new_len, num, start = 0, end = -1;
bool *set = NULL, *tmp, parsing_end = false;
char *next;
@@ -396,18 +396,19 @@ int parse_num_list(const char *s, struct test_selector *sel)
return -EINVAL;
if (end + 1 > set_len) {
- set_len = end + 1;
- tmp = realloc(set, set_len);
+ new_len = end + 1;
+ tmp = realloc(set, new_len);
if (!tmp) {
free(set);
return -ENOMEM;
}
+ for (i = set_len; i < start; i++)
+ tmp[i] = false;
set = tmp;
+ set_len = new_len;
}
- for (i = start; i <= end; i++) {
+ for (i = start; i <= end; i++)
set[i] = true;
- }
-
}
if (!set)
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists