linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.6 062/149] rtw88: Fix incorrect beamformee role setting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200411230347.22371-62-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Sat, 11 Apr 2020 19:02:19 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Tzu-En Huang <tehuang@...ltek.com>,
        Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@...ltek.com>,
        Chris Chiu <chiu@...lessm.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.6 062/149] rtw88: Fix incorrect beamformee role setting

From: Tzu-En Huang <tehuang@...ltek.com>

[ Upstream commit aa7619a39acef91c5a6904f3ada7d0f20e2ad25e ]

In associating and configuring beamformee, bfee->role is not
correctly set before rtw_chip_ops::config_bfee().
Fix it by setting it correctly.

Signed-off-by: Tzu-En Huang <tehuang@...ltek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@...ltek.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Chiu <chiu@...lessm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/bf.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/bf.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/bf.c
index fda771d23f712..b6d1d71f4d302 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/bf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/bf.c
@@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ void rtw_bf_assoc(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
 	struct ieee80211_sta_vht_cap *ic_vht_cap;
 	const u8 *bssid = bss_conf->bssid;
 	u32 sound_dim;
-	u8 bfee_role = RTW_BFEE_NONE;
 	u8 i;
 
 	if (!(chip->band & RTW_BAND_5G))
@@ -67,7 +66,7 @@ void rtw_bf_assoc(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
 		}
 
 		ether_addr_copy(bfee->mac_addr, bssid);
-		bfee_role = RTW_BFEE_MU;
+		bfee->role = RTW_BFEE_MU;
 		bfee->p_aid = (bssid[5] << 1) | (bssid[4] >> 7);
 		bfee->aid = bss_conf->aid;
 		bfinfo->bfer_mu_cnt++;
@@ -85,7 +84,7 @@ void rtw_bf_assoc(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
 		sound_dim >>= IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SOUNDING_DIMENSIONS_SHIFT;
 
 		ether_addr_copy(bfee->mac_addr, bssid);
-		bfee_role = RTW_BFEE_SU;
+		bfee->role = RTW_BFEE_SU;
 		bfee->sound_dim = (u8)sound_dim;
 		bfee->g_id = 0;
 		bfee->p_aid = (bssid[5] << 1) | (bssid[4] >> 7);
@@ -102,7 +101,6 @@ void rtw_bf_assoc(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
 	}
 
 out_unlock:
-	bfee->role = bfee_role;
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
-- 
2.20.1