linux-kernel - ping: [PATCH v3] NFS:remove redundant call to nfs_do

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAABZP2yNZoSGr+t6T6KdFhu_3xM1HsM_ft1rK=gHRyyRTbCUMw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 11 Apr 2020 11:09:59 +0800
From:   Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>
To:     trond.myklebust@...merspace.com, anna.schumaker@...app.com,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        paulmck@...ux.ibm.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, neilb@...e.com
Cc:     Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>, 340442286 <340442286@...com>
Subject: ping: [PATCH v3] NFS:remove redundant call to nfs_do_access

ping

On 3/6/20, Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com> wrote:
> In function nfs_permission:
> 1. the rcu_read_lock and rcu_read_unlock around nfs_do_access
> is unnecessary because the rcu critical data structure is already
> protected in subsidiary function nfs_access_get_cached_rcu. No other
> data structure needs rcu_read_lock in nfs_do_access.
>
> 2. call nfs_do_access once is enough, because:
> 2-1. when mask has MAY_NOT_BLOCK bit
> The second call to nfs_do_access will not happen.
>
> 2-2. when mask has no MAY_NOT_BLOCK bit
> The second call to nfs_do_access will happen if res == -ECHILD, which
> means the first nfs_do_access goes out after statement if (!may_block).
> The second call to nfs_do_access will go through this procedure once
> again except continue the work after if (!may_block).
> But above work can be performed by only one call to nfs_do_access
> without mangling the mask flag.
>
> Tested in x86_64
> Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>
> ---
>  fs/nfs/dir.c |    9 +--------
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c
> index 193d6fb..37b0c10 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c
> @@ -2732,14 +2732,7 @@ int nfs_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
>  	if (!NFS_PROTO(inode)->access)
>  		goto out_notsup;
>
> -	/* Always try fast lookups first */
> -	rcu_read_lock();
> -	res = nfs_do_access(inode, cred, mask|MAY_NOT_BLOCK);
> -	rcu_read_unlock();
> -	if (res == -ECHILD && !(mask & MAY_NOT_BLOCK)) {
> -		/* Fast lookup failed, try the slow way */
> -		res = nfs_do_access(inode, cred, mask);
> -	}
> +	res = nfs_do_access(inode, cred, mask);
>  out:
>  	if (!res && (mask & MAY_EXEC))
>  		res = nfs_execute_ok(inode, mask);
> --
> 1.7.1
>
>