linux-kernel - Re: Coccinelle rule for CVE-2019-18683

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <80df111f-8d34-f3c4-add5-4d041410b5a5@web.de>
Date:   Sat, 11 Apr 2020 07:07:13 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
        kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Cc:     Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
        Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Coccinelle rule for CVE-2019-18683

> Analysing each matching case would take a lot of time.

How many efforts would you like to invest in adjusting the situation?

Will any more development possibilities picked up to reduce the presentation
of false positives by the mentioned source code analysis approach considerably?

Regards,
Markus